False Images of Christ

False Images of Christ

A recently discovered rendition of Christ by none other than  Leonardo Da Vinci,   I often wonder how many know the true story surrounding the images of Christ in the western world ……

Cesar Borgia is in the book entitled Triptych of Poisoners, and is also in the book entitled Cesar Borgia His Life and Times by Sarah Bradford. Between 1502 and 1503, he employed Leonardo Da Vinci as a military architect and engineer, in which him and Leonardo Da Vinci became intimate instantaneously, they were lovers. To express his love towards Cesar, Leonardo painted many pictures of him. Cesar’s Father Rodrigo Borgia, who later became Pope Alexander VI, under the authority of the Catholic Church Elite, had his son picture put up as Jesus Christ in the Western World. Cesar had sex with his own sister Lucrezia, and he killed his brother Giovanni in 1497, and this is the man whom the Catholic Church gave their consent to allowing his picture to be put up and portrayed as Jesus Christ to deceive the whole world to think Christ was European. See what most people don’t know is, there was a competition during the time called the Renaissance period, between Leonardo Da Vinci and the well known Michelangelo. The competition was to see who could impress the king by a making a new image of the King’s son that would deceive the world, in which Leonardo Da Vinci won the competition…..

Wisdom of Solomon 14:8But that which is made with hands is cursed, as well it, as he that made it: he, because he made it; and it, because, being corruptible, it was called god.

Scripture says that which is made with hands is cursed, but why would it be so? Isaiah 2:8 – Their land also is full of idols; they worship the work of their own hands, that which their own fingers have made: Because the image that they put up, they called it Christ, which therefore it not being Christ made it a curse and a sin unto them because they themselves made it with their own hands and fingers. So therefore by calling it Christ, they give glory unto another and not the true and living God, therefore they worship it and give honor to it as being God which makes it idolatry. So being corruptible, this image was called God, so when the true people would begin to desire to learn about Christ, they would be told hey worship this guy, then they would ask who is he, and they would be told he’s Christ.

Question: What else is written?

Wisdom of Solomon 14:9For the ungodly and his ungodliness are both alike hateful unto God.

Wisdom of Solomon 14:10For that which is made shall be punished together with him that made it.

 So the image that the Catholic Church allowed to be put up as Christ, will be destroyed, and also them and everyone who had a hand in pushing this deception unto the people, so there is a judgement awaiting them. They didn’t do this to be nice, they had a motive behind pushing this deception which was mentally driving them to push a belief into the mindset of the people, in which they were pushing this during the Renaissance period.

Question: So now knowing that this image is idolatry and an idol of the heathens, what else is written about this?

The original King James Bible of 1611 had the Apocrypha in it, but in 1928 under the Vatican, they made an agreement to take 14 books out of the King James holy bible. Why you might ask, well because thousands of years before they put this image up to be Christ, they found out that it was written of in the Wisdom of Solomon located in the Apocrypha, that they would do this and the reason for it. So knowing this was written of in the Wisdom of Solomon, the Roman Catholic Church took it out of the bible so the people wouldn’t figure out their deception. It is a noted fact that when they did this, they knew exactly what Christ people really looked like, they knew Christ and his people were not Europeans, but instead were actually Hebrews, who were dark brown people. So let’s find out in the bible first what Satan was going to do, and then will find out what exactly was written in the Wisdom of Solomon that the Apocrypha had to be taken out and credited as unscriptual and not divinely inspired, by the Catholic Church.

Learn More

Steve Meads 

1 Response

  1. sherry.putnam.73 says:

    There are not a lot of physical descriptions of the Messiah, but Isaiah writes that he would not be charismatic, not esteemed by us, not someone contemporaneously attractive—specifically, then, not a model. despite Isaiah’s description, he renders Jesus as his heart sees him, in beauty and grace, and assumes that most artists strive to capture the emotional essence and not the physical presence of the man for whom we have no pictures.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Using cookies
This site uses cookies for you to have the best user experience. If you continue to browse you are consenting to the acceptance of the aforementioned cookies and acceptance of our cookie policy